Recently I was privileged  to attend a peer workshop, BWST-2. This was my first and I was very  excited about it. But I decided to go with a clean slate so that my  assumptions and expectations do not overshadow the actual. 
The Theme 
The  theme of this peer workshop was Bold and Beautiful, it read "Cutting  the (c)trap and getting good things done".
Wow!! I thought. I  was already impressed by the good intent of the organizers and knew that  this would be one memorable event!
According to me it takes ample  measures of courage and self-confidence to make a stand against what one  considers wrong. To bring that forth in front of your peers is even  more commendable because there is high possibility that your views may  be completely dismissed or questioned or challenged or jeered upon. You  have to be a brave-heart to face this.
That is one aspect I was  looking forward to. What would the speakers talk about and what would  the discussions be? 
 
The  concept of the workshop
In preparation for  attending the workshop I read the report on the previous year's BWST-1 and also LAWST.
The concept of a peer workshop is  very empowering.
Quoting from James Bach's blogpost, "A peer conference is a get together  among practitioners of a particular discipline for the purpose of  learning to practice better." and "At a peer conference, everyone is a  speaker, and it is expected that we will criticize each others’ ideas.  We’re after deep learning, and it’s hard to get that without getting  behind the Powerpoint glitz."
 
The participants
Another highlight of  such an event is that the participants are pre-selected by the  organizer. The great advantage of this aspect is that a unique blend of  participants can be achieved as they are hand-picked by the organizer  who keeps the theme as the basis for selection. The speakers are  selected because they have had the experience of cutting the traps and  implementing good things. Whereas, the other participants are selected  such that they may learn and implement from the experiences of the  speakers.
 
The  Facilitation
Each presentation is a high value  entity. Unlike presentations at other events which are termed as  ‘exhibition conferences’ by James Bach, peer conferences give an  opportunity to all participants to actively participate in the topic  being presented. This is invaluable. 
K-cards were used to  maintain discipline and smooth flow of each presentation. There were 3  cards, green, blue and red in color that each participant could raise  during a presentation. A green K-card indicated that the participant  wanted to ‘add his thoughts to the topic being presented’. A blue K-card  indicated ‘adding a thought about another topic which could or could  not be related to current topic’. A red K-card when flashed indicated  that the participant wanted to ‘say something right then’. It could  either mean adding to the point or debating it or challenging it.
 
The Bonds
How many times do you get a chance to share the lunch table  with a CEO or have coffee with a math wizard heading the testing of health care products? Can you imagine the wealth of information you can  get in those 10 minutes? Can you also imagine the lessons you learn  about greatness, humbleness and being a giver?
Social animals that we are, we love being  part of a community. Being part of workshops/seminars expands your  network and makes you part of the community that matters most in your  working life; the professional community!
We work in organizations with huge workforce but our daily  work routine does not permit us to create bonds outside of our team or  project. Hence, meeting your peers outside of office is very essential. 
 
The take-away
To each his own, so goes a saying, the take-away from peer  exchanges can be different for different people. To some it may create  new ideas and learning, to some it could be introspection while for  others it may be a fertile ground for creating professional relations.
 
What you and I could do
Of course its not feasible to organize or attend such large scale workshops very  often. But exchange of knowledge cannot be a quarterly event. 
So  what we can do is organize informal meetings where people spare a few  hours and assemble for a face-to-face discussion. If time is limited  then only one topic can be discussed.
Such events can  motivate us to hold extended workshops. At least we can get the ball  rolling!